Posts Tagged ‘toxins’

It’s Time to Learn From Frogs

Monday, July 6th, 2009

It’s Time to Learn From Frogs

By NICHOLAS D. KRISTOF

Published: June 27, 2009

Some of the first eerie signs of a potential health catastrophe came as bizarre deformities in water animals, often in their sexual organs.

 

Frogs, salamanders and other amphibians began to sprout extra legs. In heavily polluted Lake Apopka, one of the largest lakes in Florida, male alligators developed stunted genitals.

In the Potomac watershed near Washington, male smallmouth bass have rapidly transformed into “intersex fish” that display female characteristics. This was discovered only in 2003, but the latest survey found that more than 80 percent of the male smallmouth bass in the Potomac are producing eggs.

Now scientists are connecting the dots with evidence of increasing abnormalities among humans, particularly large increases in numbers of genital deformities among newborn boys. For example, up to 7 percent of boys are now born with undescended testicles, although this often self-corrects over time. And up to 1 percent of boys in the United States are now born with hypospadias, in which the urethra exits the penis improperly, such as at the base rather than the tip.

Apprehension is growing among many scientists that the cause of all this may be a class of chemicals called endocrine disruptors. They are very widely used in agriculture, industry and consumer products. Some also enter the water supply when estrogens in human urine — compounded when a woman is on the pill — pass through sewage systems and then through water treatment plants.

These endocrine disruptors have complex effects on the human body, particularly during fetal development of males.

“A lot of these compounds act as weak estrogen, so that’s why developing males — whether smallmouth bass or humans — tend to be more sensitive,” said Robert Lawrence, a professor of environmental health sciences at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. “It’s scary, very scary.”

The scientific case is still far from proven, as chemical companies emphasize, and the uncertainties for humans are vast. But there is accumulating evidence that male sperm count is dropping and that genital abnormalities in newborn boys are increasing. Some studies show correlations between these abnormalities and mothers who have greater exposure to these chemicals during pregnancy, through everything from hair spray to the water they drink.

Endocrine disruptors also affect females. It is now well established that DES, a synthetic estrogen given to many pregnant women from the 1930s to the 1970s to prevent miscarriages, caused abnormalities in the children. They seemed fine at birth, but girls born to those women have been more likely to develop misshaped sexual organs and cancer.

There is also some evidence from both humans and monkeys that endometriosis, a gynecological disorder, is linked to exposure to endocrine disruptors. Researchers also suspect that the disruptors can cause early puberty in girls.

A rush of new research has also tied endocrine disruptors to obesity, insulin resistance and diabetes, in both animals and humans. For example, mice exposed in utero even to low doses of endocrine disruptors appear normal at first but develop excess abdominal body fat as adults.

Among some scientists, there is real apprehension at the new findings — nothing is more terrifying than reading The Journal of Pediatric Urology — but there hasn’t been much public notice or government action.

This month, the Endocrine Society, an organization of scientists specializing in this field, issued a landmark 50-page statement. It should be a wake-up call.

“We present the evidence that endocrine disruptors have effects on male and female reproduction, breast development and cancer, prostate cancer, neuroendocrinology, thyroid, metabolism and obesity, and cardiovascular endocrinology,” the society declared.

“The rise in the incidence in obesity,” it added, “matches the rise in the use and distribution of industrial chemicals that may be playing a role in generation of obesity.”

The Environmental Protection Agency is moving toward screening endocrine disrupting chemicals, but at a glacial pace. For now, these chemicals continue to be widely used in agricultural pesticides and industrial compounds. Everybody is exposed.

“We should be concerned,” said Dr. Ted Schettler of the Science and Environmental Health Network. “This can influence brain development, sperm counts or susceptibility to cancer, even where the animal at birth seems perfectly normal.”

The most notorious example of water pollution occurred in 1969, when the Cuyahoga River in Ohio caught fire and helped shock America into adopting the Clean Water Act. Since then, complacency has taken hold.

Those deformed frogs and intersex fish — not to mention the growing number of deformities in newborn boys — should jolt us once again.

I invite you to comment on this column on my blog, On the Ground. Please also join me on Facebook, watch my YouTube videos and follow me on Twitter.

North Star

Wednesday, June 24th, 2009

In business, sometimes you get lost and cannot find your way. I have always looked for the Northern Star to guide me home. By this I mean finding the things that matter most to your company, your aspirations or even the dreaded mission statement. We have a stated aspiration about caring for the Planet, Nature and You.

So when the tough questions come up we need to look at our aspirations:

1) How can we make our products have a minimum affect the planet?

2) How can we make our products have a minimum affect on nature?

3) How can our product provide the best performance and safety?

All that said, we are trying to work within a matrix where all decisions need to be measured:

1) The product must work!

2) We want to follow the precautionary principle where we do not use any ingredients that may be considered harmful to the consumer. We have eliminated all known ingredients that may be hazardous to your health by not using ingredients like SLS, parabens or phthalates. We continue to monitor third party consumer groups like the Environmental Working Group to increase our knowledge.

3) We want to ensure 100% transparency in our labels by showing all ingredients in our products even when we are not required to do so. We want each label on ever bottle to factually represent what is in the bottle.

4) We want to fully disclose all known allergens in our products, even at the risk of losing some potential consumers.

5) We always want to use natural ingredients that are “plant based.” We will not and cannot use animal bi-products. We are committed to comply with PETA guidelines that include no animal testing in our finished products or in ingredients that we use.

6) We create products with the least amount of packaging possible. Less material is better when it comes to packaging.

7) We want to use as much recycled material in our finished products as possible and create packaging that is easy to recycle. We want to create packaging that uses single source material whereby all components of the bottle are made of the same material, which will aid and simplify recycling.

8.) We want to develop methods for reducing our carbon footprint from the sourcing, manufacturing and logistics of our products throughout the supply chain to our consumers.

9) We want to use green chemistry to continue making step changes in manufacturing the most natural product in our the natural body care industry that delivers on the promises that consumers have come to expect from traditional body care sold in mass retailers.

10) We want to have the pride and confidence that we gave done the best job possible in making our products so that just like a master craftsman or an artist, we can sign our finished work with our signature.

These are the aspirations that have guided us along our journey. I know if we follow these aspirations we are confident that we will never get lost.

Mike

Green is worth it

Wednesday, June 10th, 2009

One of my biggest personal pet peeves is the ignorant mindset that going green is too expensive.  I have heard far too many people say that they can’t afford a more sustainable lifestyle. While although it may be more expensive to buy the initial green products they quickly pay off themselves.

As someone aspiring to one day become an architect; I read many books about sustainable construction. In one of the current books I am reading it goes over the myth of green costing more in light bulbs. While although a compact florescent bulb costs $1.50 as opposed to the $.40 of a standard bulb the extra $1.10 turns into $30.70 savings after running for 7,000 hours. This is all because it is a cleaner lower wattage bulb that is more efficient with power.

I have also read studies where clients have opted to use cheaper building materials and less clean construction methods to save pocket change. This however means that the materials could allergens or even semi-toxic chemicals. This means that the occupants could experience health problems such as asthma (a large problem for urban dwelling citizens due to pollutants). Thus leading to sickness, large medical expenses, and even death. Which could all be avoided if the initial client opted to use cleaner building methods.

The same applies to other products like personal care and groceries. We need to consider if the “bargain” products are good for your body. Are they safe to be around your children and pets? Where animals harmed to create it? How much pollution came to be for you to save those dollars?

Maybe this whole crises thing is a joke and the world will magically not run out of resources but what is the worst that happens if we take care of our selves and the planet.

You are what you eat. You eat healthy you feel healthy. You take care of your body it takes care of you. By spending a few dollars more you could save your self from health problems down the road.

 

Jonny

 

Jonny

33 years in the making …

Saturday, May 9th, 2009

In 1976 I drove my big Ford station wagon with insecticides in the car. Something about this never felt right but I couldn’t put my finger on what it was.


In 1985, while working for a pharmaceutical company in New Jersey, I would leave work to the sound of dogs barking from cages outside of the laboratorySomething about this never felt right but I could never put my finger on what is was.


In 1989 while working for a large agricultural company in Nebraska, Marissa asked me why we clipped the caged chickens’ beaks off. Something about this never felt right but I could never put my finger on what it was.

 

In 1995, when we lived in Florida on a beautiful golf course, our dog Teddie died of cancer. Something about this never felt right but I could never put my finger on what is was.

 

In 1998, when working in Colorado, I noticed one day that all of the prairie dogs that lived in the field outside of our  office had disappeared. Something about this never felt right but I could never put my finger on what it was.

 

In 2003, while working in California, I learned that one out of every seven women would get breast cancer. Something about this never felt right. I knew then what was wrong and once you know, you know. I now know what we are doing to the environment and to nature. I know it is wrong. 

 

We can no longer claim ignorance. We now know what is happening and what is wrong. Now it is up to us to make changes and stop it.

 

Mike